-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
Object dtype for empty describe #27184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -42,6 +42,17 @@ def test_describe(self): | |
index=['count', 'unique', 'top', 'freq']) | ||
tm.assert_series_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
||
def test_describe_empty_object(self): | ||
# https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas/issues/27183 | ||
s = pd.Series([None, None], dtype=object) | ||
result = s.describe() | ||
expected = pd.Series([0, 0, np.nan, np.nan], dtype=object, | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. actually you use np.nan here |
||
index=['count', 'unique', 'top', 'freq']) | ||
tm.assert_series_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
||
result = s[:0].describe() | ||
tm.assert_series_equal(result, expected) | ||
|
||
def test_describe_with_tz(self, tz_naive_fixture): | ||
# GH 21332 | ||
tz = tz_naive_fixture | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was added in 0.25.0. Returning object dtype isn't an (additional) API change from 0.24
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should these be np.nan? (and not None); I am not sure we actually check this in the comparator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It wasn't clear to me whether I should use None or NaN. Arguments for NaN instead of None
but I don't know what's best.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
right I think we should np.nan; however I don't remember if we actually test this in assert_series_equal; maybe the check_exact arg does this but I don't remember.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice catch