-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
Correct assert_frame_equal doc string #22552
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
b8a7530
234cb53
62f29a0
0f8cb08
0019855
3c532ce
6a861d7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1314,13 +1314,13 @@ def assert_frame_equal(left, right, check_dtype=True, | |
right : DataFrame | ||
check_dtype : bool, default True | ||
Whether to check the DataFrame dtype is identical. | ||
check_index_type : bool / string {'equiv'}, default False | ||
check_index_type : bool / string {'equiv'}, default 'equiv' | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think what we've been using in these cases is There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. IMO that is more confusing. e.g. it might imply I pass a set. I'm not sure it's worth a special case for when there is only one possible string value. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. what is your suggestion, just There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think as it is above is good. It's maybe a little verbose but is very clear.
Happy to revisit if a standard emerges. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. You have the standard here: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/contributing_docstring.html#parameter-types If you can use the first format I suggested, that would be great. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Thanks. I have used your suggestion. |
||
Whether to check the Index class, dtype and inferred_type | ||
are identical. | ||
check_column_type : bool / string {'equiv'}, default False | ||
check_column_type : bool / string {'equiv'}, default 'equiv' | ||
Whether to check the columns class, dtype and inferred_type | ||
are identical. | ||
check_frame_type : bool, default False | ||
check_frame_type : bool, default True | ||
Whether to check the DataFrame class is identical. | ||
check_less_precise : bool or int, default False | ||
Specify comparison precision. Only used when check_exact is False. | ||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.