Trim unncessary code in datetime/np_datetime.c #21962
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gfyoung
added
Datetime
jreback
reviewed
Jul 18, 2018
| @@ -147,6 +147,9 @@ cdef inline void td64_to_tdstruct(int64_t td64, | |||
|
|
|||
| cdef inline int64_t pydatetime_to_dt64(datetime val, | |||
| npy_datetimestruct *dts): | |||
| """ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is called by some very perf-sensitive code, all uses of which already handle this carefully. I think its sufficiently internal to be OK without.
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #21962 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.96% 91.96%
=======================================
Files 166 166
Lines 50329 50329
=======================================
Hits 46287 46287
Misses 4042 4042
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
thanks @jbrockmendel |
Sup3rGeo
pushed a commit
to Sup3rGeo/pandas
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 1, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
pydatetime_to_datetimestructdoes a ton of checking that boils down to "is this a valid datetime object?" Since the function only gets called after a type-check, we can assume it is a date/datetime and be a lot less verbose about it.This also rips out an unnecessary layer of functions
convert_datetime_to_datetimestruct,convert_timedelta_to_timedeltastruct.cc @WillAyd you mentioned wanting to work on your C-foo. There's a comment about figuring out how to import the cpython datetime C-API. Any thoughts?