Skip to content

PERF: perf regressions vs 0.14.0 #7633

Closed
@jreback

Description

@jreback

We have many + perf fixes in 0.14.1 yeh!

but need to look at these (resamples could be spurious)

dataframe_resample_mean_string               |   4.0483 |   2.4170 |   1.6749 |
dataframe_resample_max_numpy                 |   3.3394 |   1.7230 |   1.9381 |
dataframe_resample_max_string                |   3.3154 |   1.7047 |   1.9448 |
dataframe_resample_min_numpy                 |   3.3020 |   1.6843 |   1.9604 |
dataframe_resample_min_string                |   3.2830 |   1.6587 |   1.9793 |
timeseries_timestamp_downsample_mean         |  11.4803 |   4.0847 |   2.8106 |
timeseries_period_downsample_mean            |  29.7631 |  10.3510 |   2.8754 |
datetimeindex_normalize                      |  77.5570 |   3.0633 |  25.3183 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test name                                    | head[ms] | base[ms] |  ratio   |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ratio < 1.0 means the target commit is faster then the baseline.
Seed used: 1234

Target [272dae5] : BUG: doc example in groupby.rst (GH7559 / GH7628)
Base   [da0f7ae] : RLS: 0.14.0 final

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    PerformanceMemory or execution speed performance

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions