-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
GroupBy[Series].count() return type should be Series[int] #966
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
adc8df5
GroupBy[Series].count() return type should be Series[int]
chrisyeh96 b353b02
Use np.integer instead of np.int_
chrisyeh96 fded8c9
Merge branch 'pandas-dev:main' into main
chrisyeh96 f5c2122
Update pyright requirement '>=1.1.369' -> '>=1.1.374'
chrisyeh96 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer removing
def count()
from here, and having declarations inDataFrameGroupBy
andSeriesGroupBy
incore/groupby/generic.pyi
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm a new contributor to this repo and eager to learn more about these choices. Is there a specific reason for moving the declarations to
core/groupby/generic.pyi
?In the actual pandas repo, the
count()
method is implemented incore/groupby/groupby.py
, notcore/groupby/generic.py
.Thanks in advance for taking the time to explain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It probably is due to that we had issues in the past with doing overloads where
self
was declared asSeries
vs.DataFrame
, so putting the stubs in the lower classes was a way to get around that problem.The type checkers have improved, so it's possible your approach could be used going forward.
Having said that, I see that for
any()
andall()
in the file you changed, that was the pattern used, so maybe your change was fine the way it was!As an example, there are a number of methods shared between
Series
andDataFrame
that are implemented inNDFrame
, but instead of putting the stub inNDFrame
, we put them inSeries
andDataFrame
to clarify that the results are different in the two subclasses.