Skip to content

fix: remove problematic leader election unit test #1496

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2022

Conversation

csviri
Copy link
Collaborator

@csviri csviri commented Sep 23, 2022

this test would fail for anyone that has kube config inited locally that makes is quite problematic, would rather remove it

this test would fail for anyone that has kube config inited locally
that makes is quite problematic, would rather remove it
@csviri csviri self-assigned this Sep 23, 2022
@csviri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

csviri commented Sep 23, 2022

cc @honnix

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@honnix
Copy link
Contributor

honnix commented Sep 23, 2022

OK I see, so it would fail if kubeconfig does have namespace set.

@csviri csviri requested a review from metacosm September 23, 2022 12:55
@csviri
Copy link
Collaborator Author

csviri commented Sep 23, 2022

OK I see, so it would fail if kubeconfig does have namespace set.

yep, checking how to unset it, but did not found anything smart to do that :(

@honnix
Copy link
Contributor

honnix commented Sep 23, 2022

Let's kill it then. It's not worth. :)

@csviri csviri merged commit 3eb0aab into main Sep 23, 2022
@csviri csviri deleted the remove-problematic-test branch September 23, 2022 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants