Skip to content

Update expanded FAIR acronym member, reproducible to reusable #348

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2021

Conversation

aaraney
Copy link
Contributor

@aaraney aaraney commented Dec 6, 2021

Objective

Use word reusable instead of reproducible when expanding the acronym FAIR in the charter.

Given my new coming to the group, I am not sure if this topic has already been discussed and this is a moot point. In reading the charter, I see the work reproducible is used instead of reusable. Reusable is the accepted 'R' in FAIR.

Reference:
"namely, that all research objects should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) both for machines and for people."

Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3, 160018 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Changes

  • R in FAIR now reusable in charter. Previously reproducible.

Reusable is the accepted 'R' in FAIR. Reference: 
"namely, that all research objects should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) both for machines and for people."

Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3, 160018 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
@alee
Copy link
Member

alee commented Dec 6, 2021

Thanks for catching that!

@alee alee merged commit a263b59 into openmodelingfoundation:develop Dec 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants