Support of recursive and circular references

[mtovts]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
References to schemas that have not been processed yet are not supported now. See the example.

Describe the solution you'd like
I suggest to add models that are referenced without properties. And fill in the properties later. This adds the ability to refer to schemas that have not been processed yet.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Also it may also be easier to create all models without properties first, then add properties with second pass.

Additional context
Example OpenAPI:

openapi: 3.0.3
info:
  title: 'Example'
  version: 0.1.0
servers:
  - url: 'http://example.com'
paths:
  '/foo':
    delete:
      responses:
        '200':
          description: OK
components:
  schemas:
    Brother:
      type: object
      properties:
        sister:
          $ref: '#/components/schemas/Sister'
    Sister:
      type: object
      properties:
        brother:
          $ref: '#/components/schemas/Brother'

Generator produces warnings and models package is empty.

Could not find reference in parsed models or enums
Reference(ref='#/components/schemas/Sister')

Could not find reference in parsed models or enums
Reference(ref='#/components/schemas/Brother')

I expect the generated models for Brother and Sister. Something like:

# models/brother.py
class Brother:
    sister: Union[Unset, Sister] = UNSET

# models/sister.py
class Sister:
    brother: Union[Unset, Brother] = UNSET

[barakalon]

This would be great!

I want to use openapi-python-client, but this issue is a blocker.

I'll keep an eye on #467...

[mtovts]

Hello, @barakalon! The branch #467 does not work and I do not plan to finish it. Instead, I wrote another one that allows to generate a client that supports circular, recursive references and inheritance in allOf cases . But it is of low quality, unfinished branch. Please PM if you need such a code. I don’t want to publish it because it’s unfinished. I don’t have time to refactor it. I think it’s the right idea, some things in model generation have to be redesigned to make it clear and high quality with support of circular references and inheritance.

By the way, I think it is better to use pydantic in models generation as it is done in datamodel-code-generator it looks cleaner. Also
I don’t really like to put the classes in one module, but it also lets not write a bunch of ugly local try ... except ... in case with circular references.
For my OpenAPI, I got a lot of local pieces like,

        try:
            from ..models import user as user_m
            # ... 15 lines 
        except ImportError:
            import sys

            user_m = sys.modules[__package__ + "user"]
            # ... 15 lines 

[dbanty]

A note for the eventual fix of this, I've added an explicit check and warning to reduce user confusion when this issue presents itself in #519 which should be removed once this is supported.

[penske-file]

What release is this scheduled to go into? when will that release go out? and what can I do to help? as this is a feature I need.

[dbanty]

There's currently no schedule for it. There is a new attempt at implementing it in #582 but I have to have time to test & review it before it can be merged. If you're able to test out that branch and give feedback on any problems you encounter, that would definitely be valuable.

[penske-file]

I am not sure how you usually work but is it possible to create a branch with the code changes that have been made then I could then add some test schemas and code along with any other changes that may be required

[maz808]

I am not sure how you usually work but is it possible to create a branch with the code changes that have been made then I could then add some test schemas and code along with any other changes that may be required

@penske-file If you have GitHub cli and have cloned the openapi-generators/openapi-python-client repo, you can use this command within the repo directory on your machine to checkout the PR branch:
gh pr checkout 582

I worked on this branch so please let me know if you have questions or run into any issues with your use cases.