Skip to content

Update 1 NuGet dependencies #296

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

nfbot
Copy link
Member

@nfbot nfbot commented Jan 30, 2025

Bumps nanoFramework.CoreLibrary from 1.15.5 to 1.16.1

[version update]

⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Dependency Updates
    • Updated nanoFramework.CoreLibrary dependency from version 1.15.5 to 1.16.1 in multiple project lock files
    • Updated content hash to reflect the new library version

Bumps nanoFramework.CoreLibrary from 1.15.5 to 1.16.1</br>
[version update]

### ⚠️ This is an automated update. ⚠️
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on updating the nanoFramework.CoreLibrary dependency version from 1.15.5 to 1.16.1 in two separate packages.lock.json files located in the source/TestFramework and source/UnitTestLauncher directories. The update involves modifying the requested and resolved versions, as well as updating the corresponding content hash for the library.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/TestFramework/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.CoreLibrary version from 1.15.5 to 1.16.1
source/UnitTestLauncher/packages.lock.json Updated nanoFramework.CoreLibrary version from 1.15.5 to 1.16.1

Possibly related PRs


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e396745 and a1e40ff.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
  • source/TestFramework/nanoFramework.TestFramework.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • source/TestFramework/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
  • source/UnitTestLauncher/nanoFramework.UnitTestLauncher.nfproj is excluded by none and included by none
  • source/UnitTestLauncher/packages.config is excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • source/TestFramework/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
  • source/UnitTestLauncher/packages.lock.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: nanoFramework.TestFramework (Build_Test_Framework)
  • GitHub Check: nanoFramework.TestFramework (Get_Build_Flags)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/UnitTestLauncher/packages.lock.json (1)

7-9: Verify the CoreLibrary version upgrade impact.

The upgrade from 1.15.5 to 1.16.1 looks correct. Let's verify the changelog for any breaking changes.

✅ Verification successful

CoreLibrary upgrade is safe and beneficial for UnitTestLauncher

The upgrade from 1.15.5 to 1.16.1 brings improvements to the test framework and several enhancements without any breaking changes. The changes are particularly beneficial for a test-related package.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the changelog between versions 1.15.5 and 1.16.1

# Fetch release notes for the version range
gh release list --repo nanoframework/CoreLibrary \
  --limit 10 | grep -E "v1.1[56]" 

Length of output: 232


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch detailed release notes for both versions
gh release view v1.16.1 --repo nanoframework/CoreLibrary
echo "-------------------"
gh release view v1.15.5 --repo nanoframework/CoreLibrary

Length of output: 2266

source/TestFramework/packages.lock.json (1)

7-9: LGTM! Version update is consistent.

The CoreLibrary version update to 1.16.1 and its content hash are consistent with the changes in UnitTestLauncher/packages.lock.json.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nfbot nfbot merged commit eb92160 into main Jan 30, 2025
5 checks passed
@nfbot nfbot deleted the nfbot/update-dependencies/47e2de24-28fc-45b8-a368-509f65aa1fe2 branch January 30, 2025 18:02
This was referenced Jan 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant