-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
fix: honor journal=true in connection string #2354
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
emadum
merged 12 commits into
master
from
NODE-2422/journal-ignored-in-connection-string
May 7, 2020
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7adef22
add tests demonstrating failure
emadum de0c7e1
remove .only
emadum 95e109b
translate 'journal' query option to 'j' for client
emadum bb577d2
cleanup
emadum 4025139
move fix to correct place
emadum 0cedc6c
[skip ci] doc: add some jsdoc
emadum a020697
cleanup
emadum 8d8db45
cleanup^2
emadum ea7781d
better names for options
emadum e703f23
fix lint error
emadum ebf6ca3
cleanup
emadum 3d757e0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into NODE-2422/journal-i…
emadum File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
to me it seems like
j
is the odd man out here, shouldn't we filter that out and depend onjournal
throughout the codebase?j
is just the field on the command send to the server.UPDATE: I now see that this is a pretty small change, while what I'm proposing would potentially touch much more of the codebase. Maybe we can defer my suggestion here to @reggi s work on
MongoClientOptions
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I think this is the minimal change necessary to fix this issue; it's probably not worth diving deep on this now when we're already planning on overhauling this entire options system; definitely worth addressing when we do the overhaul.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
btw I think the original report is for 3.5, so we'll need a port there too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#2359