-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 208
PHPC-2064: Use register_shutdown_function to disable caching of skipif results #1366
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume that was written before you added this
static
sentinel value? I don't think we need to worry about duplicate "nocache" lines.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not quite. Assuming one check exits with the message "skip this test does not work", the shutdown handler would still add "nocache" at the end, changing the message to "skip this test does not worknocache".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it necessary to append
nocache
to an existing line to avoid a BORK if it were printed on its own line after askip
?Sorry, it's been quite a while since I thought about any of this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, it's more of a side-effect of how things are done: our skip functions call
exit('skip whatever');
without a trailing newline. The shutdown handler then prints "nocache" to the output, meaning that it will be appended to the end of whatever the previous skip functions printed. As the message doesn't have a trailing newline, it's appended in the same line.Looking at run-tests.php again, I can see that the output of the skip file is run through
trim
before checking for "nocache", so we could even print a leading newline in the shutdown handler to avoid appending to a previously printed skip message. I'll take another look at that.