Skip to content

Multiple Database Connections: Extension #120

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Multiple Database Connections: Extension #120

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bastian-schur
Copy link

I changed the connection name to the database name. This would be more flexible if a tenant system use for every tenant the same connection name and only changed the database in the connection.
This change has no disadvantages compared to the previous variant

I changed the connection name to the database name. This would be more flexible if a tenant system use for every tenant the same connection name and only changed the database in the connection.
This change has no disadvantages compared to the previous variant
@bastian-schur
Copy link
Author

I'm not sure if the problems result in this change?

@mikebronner
Copy link
Owner

Yes, the failures are directly related to this PR. I do have plans to add the database name to the cache key, but keeping the connection name is critical as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants