Skip to content

[LV] Strip unnecessary make_{pair,optional} (NFC) #141924

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

artagnon
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented May 29, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-vectorizers

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: Ramkumar Ramachandra (artagnon)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141924.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp (+27-35)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
index 05b5764ffcafc..d9b71f58f15ea 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp
@@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ class LoopVectorizationCostModel {
   void setWideningDecision(Instruction *I, ElementCount VF, InstWidening W,
                            InstructionCost Cost) {
     assert(VF.isVector() && "Expected VF >=2");
-    WideningDecisions[std::make_pair(I, VF)] = std::make_pair(W, Cost);
+    WideningDecisions[{I, VF}] = {W, Cost};
   }
 
   /// Save vectorization decision \p W and \p Cost taken by the cost model for
@@ -1127,11 +1127,9 @@ class LoopVectorizationCostModel {
     for (unsigned Idx = 0; Idx < Grp->getFactor(); ++Idx) {
       if (auto *I = Grp->getMember(Idx)) {
         if (Grp->getInsertPos() == I)
-          WideningDecisions[std::make_pair(I, VF)] =
-              std::make_pair(W, InsertPosCost);
+          WideningDecisions[{I, VF}] = {W, InsertPosCost};
         else
-          WideningDecisions[std::make_pair(I, VF)] =
-              std::make_pair(W, OtherMemberCost);
+          WideningDecisions[{I, VF}] = {W, OtherMemberCost};
       }
     }
   }
@@ -1145,7 +1143,7 @@ class LoopVectorizationCostModel {
         TheLoop->isInnermost() &&
         "cost-model should not be used for outer loops (in VPlan-native path)");
 
-    std::pair<Instruction *, ElementCount> InstOnVF = std::make_pair(I, VF);
+    std::pair<Instruction *, ElementCount> InstOnVF(I, VF);
     auto Itr = WideningDecisions.find(InstOnVF);
     if (Itr == WideningDecisions.end())
       return CM_Unknown;
@@ -1156,7 +1154,7 @@ class LoopVectorizationCostModel {
   /// width \p VF.
   InstructionCost getWideningCost(Instruction *I, ElementCount VF) {
     assert(VF.isVector() && "Expected VF >=2");
-    std::pair<Instruction *, ElementCount> InstOnVF = std::make_pair(I, VF);
+    std::pair<Instruction *, ElementCount> InstOnVF(I, VF);
     assert(WideningDecisions.contains(InstOnVF) &&
            "The cost is not calculated");
     return WideningDecisions[InstOnVF].second;
@@ -1175,8 +1173,7 @@ class LoopVectorizationCostModel {
                                std::optional<unsigned> MaskPos,
                                InstructionCost Cost) {
     assert(!VF.isScalar() && "Expected vector VF");
-    CallWideningDecisions[std::make_pair(CI, VF)] = {Kind, Variant, IID,
-                                                     MaskPos, Cost};
+    CallWideningDecisions[{CI, VF}] = {Kind, Variant, IID, MaskPos, Cost};
   }
 
   CallWideningDecision getCallWideningDecision(CallInst *CI,
@@ -1373,21 +1370,20 @@ class LoopVectorizationCostModel {
   void setTailFoldingStyles(bool IsScalableVF, unsigned UserIC) {
     assert(!ChosenTailFoldingStyle && "Tail folding must not be selected yet.");
     if (!Legal->canFoldTailByMasking()) {
-      ChosenTailFoldingStyle =
-          std::make_pair(TailFoldingStyle::None, TailFoldingStyle::None);
+      ChosenTailFoldingStyle = {TailFoldingStyle::None, TailFoldingStyle::None};
       return;
     }
 
     if (!ForceTailFoldingStyle.getNumOccurrences()) {
-      ChosenTailFoldingStyle = std::make_pair(
+      ChosenTailFoldingStyle = {
           TTI.getPreferredTailFoldingStyle(/*IVUpdateMayOverflow=*/true),
-          TTI.getPreferredTailFoldingStyle(/*IVUpdateMayOverflow=*/false));
+          TTI.getPreferredTailFoldingStyle(/*IVUpdateMayOverflow=*/false)};
       return;
     }
 
     // Set styles when forced.
-    ChosenTailFoldingStyle = std::make_pair(ForceTailFoldingStyle.getValue(),
-                                            ForceTailFoldingStyle.getValue());
+    ChosenTailFoldingStyle = {ForceTailFoldingStyle.getValue(),
+                              ForceTailFoldingStyle.getValue()};
     if (ForceTailFoldingStyle != TailFoldingStyle::DataWithEVL)
       return;
     // Override forced styles if needed.
@@ -1400,9 +1396,8 @@ class LoopVectorizationCostModel {
       // If for some reason EVL mode is unsupported, fallback to
       // DataWithoutLaneMask to try to vectorize the loop with folded tail
       // in a generic way.
-      ChosenTailFoldingStyle =
-          std::make_pair(TailFoldingStyle::DataWithoutLaneMask,
-                         TailFoldingStyle::DataWithoutLaneMask);
+      ChosenTailFoldingStyle = {TailFoldingStyle::DataWithoutLaneMask,
+                                TailFoldingStyle::DataWithoutLaneMask};
       LLVM_DEBUG(
           dbgs()
           << "LV: Preference for VP intrinsics indicated. Will "
@@ -8491,7 +8486,7 @@ void VPRecipeBuilder::collectScaledReductions(VFRange &Range) {
     PartialReductionChain Chain = Pair.first;
     if (ExtendIsOnlyUsedByPartialReductions(Chain.ExtendA) &&
         ExtendIsOnlyUsedByPartialReductions(Chain.ExtendB))
-      ScaledReductionMap.insert(std::make_pair(Chain.Reduction, Pair.second));
+      ScaledReductionMap.emplace_or_assign(Chain.Reduction, Pair.second);
   }
 }
 
@@ -8563,12 +8558,11 @@ bool VPRecipeBuilder::getScaledReductions(
           [&](ElementCount VF) {
             InstructionCost Cost = TTI->getPartialReductionCost(
                 Update->getOpcode(), A->getType(), B->getType(), PHI->getType(),
-                VF, OpAExtend, OpBExtend,
-                std::make_optional(BinOp->getOpcode()));
+                VF, OpAExtend, OpBExtend, BinOp->getOpcode());
             return Cost.isValid();
           },
           Range)) {
-    Chains.push_back(std::make_pair(Chain, TargetScaleFactor));
+    Chains.emplace_back(Chain, TargetScaleFactor);
     return true;
   }
 
@@ -10418,9 +10412,9 @@ bool LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(Loop *L) {
   bool VectorizeLoop = true, InterleaveLoop = true;
   if (VF.Width.isScalar()) {
     LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Vectorization is possible but not beneficial.\n");
-    VecDiagMsg = std::make_pair(
+    VecDiagMsg = {
         "VectorizationNotBeneficial",
-        "the cost-model indicates that vectorization is not beneficial");
+        "the cost-model indicates that vectorization is not beneficial"};
     VectorizeLoop = false;
   }
 
@@ -10429,16 +10423,15 @@ bool LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(Loop *L) {
     // requested.
     LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Ignoring UserIC, because vectorization and "
                          "interleaving should be avoided up front\n");
-    IntDiagMsg = std::make_pair(
-        "InterleavingAvoided",
-        "Ignoring UserIC, because interleaving was avoided up front");
+    IntDiagMsg = {"InterleavingAvoided",
+                  "Ignoring UserIC, because interleaving was avoided up front"};
     InterleaveLoop = false;
   } else if (IC == 1 && UserIC <= 1) {
     // Tell the user interleaving is not beneficial.
     LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Interleaving is not beneficial.\n");
-    IntDiagMsg = std::make_pair(
+    IntDiagMsg = {
         "InterleavingNotBeneficial",
-        "the cost-model indicates that interleaving is not beneficial");
+        "the cost-model indicates that interleaving is not beneficial"};
     InterleaveLoop = false;
     if (UserIC == 1) {
       IntDiagMsg.first = "InterleavingNotBeneficialAndDisabled";
@@ -10449,10 +10442,9 @@ bool LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(Loop *L) {
     // Tell the user interleaving is beneficial, but it explicitly disabled.
     LLVM_DEBUG(
         dbgs() << "LV: Interleaving is beneficial but is explicitly disabled.");
-    IntDiagMsg = std::make_pair(
-        "InterleavingBeneficialButDisabled",
-        "the cost-model indicates that interleaving is beneficial "
-        "but is explicitly disabled or interleave count is set to 1");
+    IntDiagMsg = {"InterleavingBeneficialButDisabled",
+                  "the cost-model indicates that interleaving is beneficial "
+                  "but is explicitly disabled or interleave count is set to 1"};
     InterleaveLoop = false;
   }
 
@@ -10462,10 +10454,10 @@ bool LoopVectorizePass::processLoop(Loop *L) {
   if (!VectorizeLoop && InterleaveLoop && LVL.hasHistograms()) {
     LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Not interleaving without vectorization due "
                       << "to histogram operations.\n");
-    IntDiagMsg = std::make_pair(
+    IntDiagMsg = {
         "HistogramPreventsScalarInterleaving",
         "Unable to interleave without vectorization due to constraints on "
-        "the order of histogram operations");
+        "the order of histogram operations"};
     InterleaveLoop = false;
   }
 

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants