Skip to content

Test if docs can be built #96

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2017

Conversation

dims
Copy link
Collaborator

@dims dims commented Jan 12, 2017

Add a travis job for docs. This will make sure we can catch if a PR is likely to break docs

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jan 12, 2017
@mbohlool mbohlool self-assigned this Jan 12, 2017
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jan 12, 2017

Current coverage is 94.52% (diff: 100%)

Merging #96 into master will not change coverage

@@             master        #96   diff @@
==========================================
  Files             9          9          
  Lines           658        658          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
  Hits            622        622          
  Misses           36         36          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 37d20f2...8d4cd14

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ env:
- TOXENV=py27,codecov
- TOXENV=py27-functional,codecov
- TOXENV=py35-functional,codecov
- TOXENV=docs,codecov
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do we need codecov for all of these? I think it will fail for doc or functional tests. Also we have a coverage env, maybe that is enough?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, i'll fix it in another PR @mbohlool

@mbohlool
Copy link
Contributor

you have a conflict. I guess now that you are fixing the conflict you can remove all unnecessary codecov commands. Up to you though. this look good to me after fixing the conflict.

@mbohlool mbohlool added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 13, 2017
@dims dims force-pushed the enforce-doc-builds branch from a2eb6c3 to 8d4cd14 Compare January 13, 2017 10:57
@dims
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dims commented Jan 13, 2017

Ack @mbohlool fixing it while i fix the conflicts in this PR

@dims
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dims commented Jan 13, 2017

@mbohlool - rebased. Let's get this in please.

@mbohlool
Copy link
Contributor

Great. Thanks.

@mbohlool mbohlool merged commit c8b0968 into kubernetes-client:master Jan 13, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants