Skip to content

Improve wording for the type keyword in the spec #1083

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2021

Conversation

jdesrosiers
Copy link
Member

Fixes #1080

I adjusted the wording suggested in the issue, so let me know if anyone thinks it doesn't read clearly enough.

Copy link
Member

@gregsdennis gregsdennis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is clearer to me and correct.

Copy link
Member

@awwright awwright left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much improve, wow

@jdesrosiers jdesrosiers merged commit c6347d6 into json-schema-org:master Apr 12, 2021
@jdesrosiers jdesrosiers deleted the type-rewording branch April 12, 2021 21:44
@handrews handrews added this to the draft-patch milestone May 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Verbiage for type could be improved.
5 participants