Skip to content

Fix incorrect stipulation on keyword ordering for unevaluated* keywords. #1055

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2020
Merged

Fix incorrect stipulation on keyword ordering for unevaluated* keywords. #1055

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions jsonschema-core.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2549,7 +2549,7 @@
This means that "prefixItems", "items", "contains", and all in-place
applicators MUST be evaluated before this keyword can be evaluated.
Authors of extension keywords MUST NOT define an in-place applicator
that would need to be evaluated before this keyword.
that would need to be evaluated after this keyword.
</t>
<t>
If the "unevaluatedItems" subschema is applied to any
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2594,7 +2594,7 @@
This means that "properties", "patternProperties", "additionalProperties",
and all in-place applicators MUST be evaluated before this keyword can
be evaluated. Authors of extension keywords MUST NOT define an in-place
applicator that would need to be evaluated before this keyword.
applicator that would need to be evaluated after this keyword.
</t>
<t>
The annotation result of this keyword is the set of instance
Expand Down