format 'uri' and URI-references

[fd]

If this is invalid and idis supposted to be a uri (and not a relative reference). Then why is this valid?

[zaggino]

One old id discussion here zaggino/z-schema#18

[fd]

ok so in draft4 an exception is made for id which allows them to be relative references.

[handrews]

@fd in Draft 4 the "uri" format included relative references. This was corrected in Draft 5 which has both "uri" and "uriref" formats, where any "uri" is a valid "uriref", but "uriref" can include relative-references which are not valid under "uri". See json-schema-org/json-schema-org.github.io#57 which shows the proposed draft 5 meta-schema where "id" is format "uriref" while "$schema" is format "uri".

Since issue #136 is already tracking creating tests for the new draft(s), I think this issue can be closed?