draft-06 tests checklist

[epoberezkin]

• boolean schemas. PR Boolean #170 (merged)
• "id" -> "$id". PR draft-06: $id keyword #171 (merged)
• keyword "const". PR draft-06: const validation #157 (merged)
• keyword "contains". PR draft-06: contains keyword validation #158 (merged)
• numeric "exclusiveMinimum" / "exclusiveMaximum". PR draft-06: exclusiveMaximum and exclusiveMinimum validation #151 (merged)
• keyword "propertyNames". PR draft-06: propertyNames validation #154 (merged)
• empty arrays in "required" and "dependencies". PR draft-06: required and dependencies with empty property arrays #159 (merged)
• 0-terminated floats are valid integers. PR draft-06: zero-terminated float is a valid integer #164 (merged), Latest I-D: 1.0 and 1.1e1 are integers #135, PR Zero-termimated float test description, closes #135 #174 (merged)
• numeric "exclusiveMinimum/Maximum" in optional/bignum tests. PR draft-06: optional/bignum tests exclusiveMaximum/Minimum updated #172 (merged)
• formats
  • "uri" - no partial URIs. PR Flip protocol-relative URI Reference (not a URI) #156 (merged)
  • "uri-reference". PR Draft-06 formats #173 (merged)
  • "uri-template". PR Draft-06 formats #173 (merged)
  • "json-pointer". PR Draft-06 formats #173 (merged)

[epoberezkin]

@awwright @handrews @Relequestual @Julian
#157, #158 are approved - please merge
Please review #151, #154, #159

[Julian]

@epoberezkin you've now got merge rights, sorry, didn't notice before.

Enjoy.

Will try to have a look at some of the outstanding stuff there.

[epoberezkin]

@Julian thank you. I won't merge things before they are reviewed and approved anyway.

[epoberezkin]

@handrews @Relequestual @awwright @Julian could you please review PRs #171, #172, #173

[Julian]

Already did :).

Will have a look at the new one.

[Julian]

Do we have a permanent URL for the metaschema now? Some authors (at least me :) won't cut a release until such a thing is in place. Maybe that's a better blocker for the spec repo than here though.

[handrews]

Do we know the URL? Yes. Have we actually put it there? Well...
json-schema-org/json-schema-spec#265
For whatever reason, awwright absolutely refuses to do it except at the time that he submits the draft.

[Julian]

Ah, I see.

Fair enough. It does look like at least that http://json-schema.org/draft-06/schema resolves to something already.

Carry on then :)

[handrews]

Oh yeah, I forgot we did that. It's just the actual link in the draft on master that awwright refuses to allow anyone to touch.