ipfs behind proxy

[sjeeva]

I am running my IPFS behind an ngnix proxy and redirected port 5001 of IPFS to http://<IPAddress>/ipfs

We are developing a Web Interface from which we want to access http://<IPAddress>/ipfs, however js-ipfs-api supports ipfsAPI which seems to be accepting only IP address / port as shown below
var ipfs = ipfsAPI('ip4/<IPAddress>/tcp/5001', {protocol: 'http'})

Is there any option that would allow me to connect to http://<IPAddress>/ipfs using ipfsAPI?

[daviddias]

Hi @sjeeva, I'm not sure if I understand your question, but let me try to answer it and you tell me what I missed.

When you create an ipfsAPi instance with /ip4/<some-ip-addr>/tcp/5001, you are using the multiaddr format, which translates to http://:5001.

Does this answer your question? What is the http:///ipfs (triple /) that you are describing?

[sjeeva]

Opps!! few details where missing due to github formatting...

How do we translate http://<IPAddr>:<Port>/path/subpath in multiaddr format

[dryajov]

@sjeeva should be /ip4/<IPAddress>/tcp/5001/http or /ip4/<IPAddress>/tcp/5001/https same for websockets (ws/wss).

[daviddias]

@sjeeva I see, you want to hit a path so that it gets routed in nginx. http paths are not part of the multiaddr spec (although it has been considered).

Wanna add support for that specific feature to this module?

[sjeeva]

@diasdavid, yes.. if you give me a few pointer in the code, I can work on this feature...

[daviddias]

The parsing happens here -- https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs-api/blob/master/src/index.js#L9-L44 --, you should just have to test for the multiaddr + path case and break it to host (including path) + port respectively.

[vasco-santos]

Hey @diasdavid and @sjeeva

I have deployed IPFS behind a proxy and I have analyzed this problem.

Basically, the problem is in this line. There is a default port defined by getConfig. As a consequence, when ipfsAPI receives a http://<IPAddress>/ipfs, the default port is appended to it: http://<IPAddress>/ipfs:5001.

I agree that we should have a default port value, but it blocks this use cases. I was thinking on a possible solution for identifying when we should set the default port.

try {
    const maddr = multiaddr(hostOrMultiaddr).nodeAddress()
    config.host = maddr.address
    config.port = maddr.port
  } catch (e) {
    if (typeof hostOrMultiaddr === 'string') {
      config.host = hostOrMultiaddr
      config.port = port && typeof port !== 'object' ? port : config.port
    }
  }

If the received parameter is not in the multiaddr format, the catch code will be executed. Here, we have to decide wether to use the default port or not.

I cannot find any good solution for solving this maintaining the default value, when the received hostname is not a multiaddr but it is a String. In this case, I think I would go with the following:

  } catch (e) {
    if (typeof hostOrMultiaddr === 'string') {
      config.host = hostOrMultiaddr
      if (hostOrMultiaddr.indexOf(':') > -1 || !port || typeof port === 'object' ) ){
        config.port = undefined
      } else {
        config.port = port
      }
    }
  }

What are your thoughts? Should I advance with this solution?