Consider per-language core-interface repos

[magik6k]

Go implementation of core-interface (CoreAPI) is getting to the stage where it can be extracted from go-ipfs repo, and afaik it's supposed to live it this repo together with js interface definitions / tests.

But there are problems:

• Both NPM and GX use package.json
• Many tools expect package.json to live in repository root (things like gx-workspace, our Jenkins pipelines)
• Packages will carry unnecessary bloat (this can probably be mitigated)
• This will only get worse with more languages

I'd say that this repo should stay focused on JS, and interface repos should be called [lang]-ipfs-interface

@alanshaw @Stebalien @daviddias (+others) Thoughts?

[Stebalien]

I tend to agree. It may make sense to have a single repo for interface design/documentation but having multiple implementations in a single repo seems a bit odd.

[alanshaw]

+1

[daviddias]

Sounds good to me. Can we do instead

interface-[lang]-[name] so that then we can apply it to all the libp2p interfaces as well?

[daviddias]

Seems that we have consensus. Wanna take this on?

Pinging @vasco-santos @jacobheun to update the libp2p ones as well (note, we can keep the package name)

[magik6k]

So interface-go-ipfs? I'll handle Go side soon, after ipfs/kubo#5969 and one other PR with minor fixes.

[daviddias]

interface-go-ipfs-core to be exact (HTTP API and CLI are the other APIs)

[jacobheun]

@daviddias just to clarify, the goal is to have, for example, interface-stream-muxer be a language agnostic repo for design/docs and we would create interface-js-stream-muxer with the current content, except the go information?

[alanshaw]

Repo renamed and PR here for moving stuff in js/ dir back to root: #435

[Stebalien]

@daviddias any reason to do interface-[lang]-[name] instead of [lang]-[name]-interface? We have quite a few packages following the latter convention.

[alanshaw]

I'm ok with that also, in fact I think I prefer it - so it would be js-interface-ipfs-core and go-interface-ipfs-core for example.

[Stebalien]

Yes but @daviddias asked for the current naming scheme so I'd like to get his reasoning before we rename again.