Skip to content

Improve information about group offloading and layerwise casting #11101

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 24, 2025
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
20 changes: 20 additions & 0 deletions docs/source/en/optimization/memory.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -198,6 +198,18 @@ export_to_video(video, "output.mp4", fps=8)

Group offloading (for CUDA devices with support for asynchronous data transfer streams) overlaps data transfer and computation to reduce the overall execution time compared to sequential offloading. This is enabled using layer prefetching with CUDA streams. The next layer to be executed is loaded onto the accelerator device while the current layer is being executed - this increases the memory requirements slightly. Group offloading also supports leaf-level offloading (equivalent to sequential CPU offloading) but can be made much faster when using streams.

<Tip>

- Group offloading may not work with all models out-of-the-box. If the forward implementations of the model contain weight-dependent device-casting of inputs, it may clash with the offloading mechanism's handling of device-casting.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should also mention that it can be disabled on modules with the skip patterns.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't support skipping in group offloading. Will mention for layerwise casting though

- The `offload_type` parameter can be set to either `block_level` or `leaf_level`. `block_level` offloads groups of `torch::nn::ModuleList` or `torch::nn:Sequential` modules based on a configurable attribute `num_blocks_per_group`. For example, if you set `num_blocks_per_group=2` on a standard transformer model containing 40 layers, it will onload/offload 2 layers at a time for a total of 20 onload/offloads. This drastically reduces the VRAM requirements. `leaf_level` offloads individual layers at the lowest level, which is equivalent to sequential offloading. However, unlike sequential offloading, group offloading can be made much faster when using streams, with minimal compromise to end-to-end generation time.
- The `use_stream` parameter can be used with CUDA devices to enable prefetching layers for onload. It defaults to `False`. Layer prefetching allows overlapping computation and data transfer of model weights, which drastically reduces the overall execution time compared to other offloading methods. However, it can increase the CPU RAM usage significantly. Ensure that available CPU RAM that is at least twice the size of the model when setting `use_stream=True`. You can find more information about CUDA streams [here](https://pytorch.org/docs/stable/generated/torch.cuda.Stream.html)
- If specifying `use_stream=True` on VAEs with tiling enabled, make sure to do a dummy forward pass (possibly with dummy inputs) before the actual inference to avoid device-mismatch errors. This may not work on all implementations. Please open an issue if you encounter any problems.
- The parameter `low_cpu_mem_usage` can be set to `True` to reduce CPU memory usage when using streams for group offloading. This is useful when the CPU memory is the bottleneck, but it may counteract the benefits of using streams and increase the overall execution time. The CPU memory savings come from creating pinned-tensors on-the-fly instead of pre-pinning them. This parameter is better suited for using `leaf_level` offloading.

For more information about available parameters and an explanation of how group offloading works, refer to [`~hooks.group_offloading.apply_group_offloading`].

</Tip>

## FP8 layerwise weight-casting

PyTorch supports `torch.float8_e4m3fn` and `torch.float8_e5m2` as weight storage dtypes, but they can't be used for computation in many different tensor operations due to unimplemented kernel support. However, you can use these dtypes to store model weights in fp8 precision and upcast them on-the-fly when the layers are used in the forward pass. This is known as layerwise weight-casting.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -235,6 +247,14 @@ In the above example, layerwise casting is enabled on the transformer component

However, you gain more control and flexibility by directly utilizing the [`~hooks.layerwise_casting.apply_layerwise_casting`] function instead of [`~ModelMixin.enable_layerwise_casting`].

<Tip>

- Layerwise casting may not work with all models out-of-the-box. Sometimes, the forward implementations of the model might contain internal typecasting of weight values. Such implementations are not supported due to the currently simplistic implementation of layerwise casting, which assumes that the forward pass is independent of the weight precision and that the input dtypes are always in `compute_dtype`. An example of an incompatible implementation can be found [here](https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/blob/7f5077e53682ca855afc826162b204ebf809f1f9/src/transformers/models/t5/modeling_t5.py#L294-L299).
- Layerwise casting may fail on custom modeling implementations that make use of [PEFT](https://github.com/huggingface/peft) layers. Some minimal checks to handle this case is implemented but is not extensively tested or guaranteed to work in all cases.
- It can be also be applied partially to specific layers of a model. Partially applying layerwise casting can either be done manually by calling the `apply_layerwise_casting` function on specific internal modules, or by specifying the `skip_modules_pattern` and `skip_modules_classes` parameters for a root module. These parameters are particularly useful for layers such as normalization and modulation.

</Tip>

## Channels-last memory format

The channels-last memory format is an alternative way of ordering NCHW tensors in memory to preserve dimension ordering. Channels-last tensors are ordered in such a way that the channels become the densest dimension (storing images pixel-per-pixel). Since not all operators currently support the channels-last format, it may result in worst performance but you should still try and see if it works for your model.
Expand Down
6 changes: 5 additions & 1 deletion src/diffusers/hooks/group_offloading.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ def apply_group_offloading(
num_blocks_per_group: Optional[int] = None,
non_blocking: bool = False,
use_stream: bool = False,
low_cpu_mem_usage=False,
low_cpu_mem_usage: bool = False,
) -> None:
r"""
Applies group offloading to the internal layers of a torch.nn.Module. To understand what group offloading is, and
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -378,6 +378,10 @@ def apply_group_offloading(
use_stream (`bool`, defaults to `False`):
If True, offloading and onloading is done asynchronously using a CUDA stream. This can be useful for
overlapping computation and data transfer.
low_cpu_mem_usage (`bool`, defaults to `False`):
If True, the CPU memory usage is minimized by pinning tensors on-the-fly instead of pre-pinning them. This
option only matters when using streamed CPU offloading (i.e. `use_stream=True`). This can be useful when
the CPU memory is a bottleneck but may counteract the benefits of using streams.

Example:
```python
Expand Down
Loading