Add code coverage reports

[gsnedders]

No description provided.

[landscape-bot]

Code quality remained the same when pulling 85de9fd on gsnedders:codecov into 46dae3d on html5lib:master.

[gsnedders]

Build failure is because coverage >= 4.0.0 doesn't support 3.2

[gsnedders]

codecov/codecov-python#48

[gsnedders]

For the curious wondering why we're going with the more obscure codecov instead of coveralls: codecov have branch coverage.

[hoppipolla-critic-bot]

Critic review: https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/6052

This is an external review system which you may optionally use for the code review of your pull request.

In order to help critic track your changes, please do not make in-place history rewrites (e.g. via git rebase -i or git commit --amend) when updating this pull request.

[landscape-bot]

Repository health decreased by 0.33% when pulling eb56e79 on gsnedders:codecov into 46dae3d on html5lib:master.

• 2 new problems were found (including 1 error and 1 code smell).
• 5 problems were fixed (including 1 error and 4 code smells).

[gsnedders]

PyPy with coverage seems really slow for some reason; should probably move to only having coverage with CPython.

[gsnedders]

And PyPy3k fails big-time with stuff like:

html5lib/tests/tree_construction.py:65: in runtest
    output = convertTreeDump(p.tree.testSerializer(document))
html5lib/treebuilders/etree.py:319: in testSerializer
    return testSerializer(element)
E   TypeError: testSerializer() takes exactly 2 arguments (1 given)

[landscape-bot]

Repository health decreased by 0.33% when pulling c3ca303 on gsnedders:codecov into 46dae3d on html5lib:master.

• 2 new problems were found (including 1 error and 1 code smell).
• 5 problems were fixed (including 1 error and 4 code smells).

[gsnedders]

The PyPy3k issue is reported as https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/issues/2225/pypy3k-settrace-_trace-messes-up-scoping FWIW

[landscape-bot]

Code quality remained the same when pulling 969d29b on gsnedders:codecov into 4205423 on html5lib:master.

[gsnedders]

@jgraham r?

[codecov-io]

Current coverage is 89.41%

Branch #220 has no coverage reports uploaded yet.

No diff could be generated. No reports for master found.
Review entire Coverage Diff as of 8352c62

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

[landscape-bot]

Code quality remained the same when pulling c7fbb91 on gsnedders:codecov into d999875 on html5lib:master.

[landscape-bot]

Code quality remained the same when pulling 9e27ea1 on gsnedders:codecov into d999875 on html5lib:master.

[landscape-bot]

Code quality remained the same when pulling fc0077a on gsnedders:codecov into d999875 on html5lib:master.

[landscape-bot]

Code quality remained the same when pulling a231231 on gsnedders:codecov into d999875 on html5lib:master.

[landscape-bot]

Code quality remained the same when pulling 66a3f42 on gsnedders:codecov into 91876a7 on html5lib:master.