Skip to content

Update evaluate-expressions-in-workflows-and-actions.md #38230

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 16 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

silky-x0
Copy link

Explained how operators are used.

issue-#37006

Why:

Which operator is a ternary exactly? #37006

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

image

Check off the following:

  • [ x] A subject matter expert (SME) has reviewed the technical accuracy of the content in this PR. In most cases, the author can be the SME. Open source contributions may require an SME review from GitHub staff.
  • [x ] The changes in this PR meet the docs fundamentals that are required for all content.
  • [x ] All CI checks are passing and the changes look good in the review environment.

Copy link

welcome bot commented May 12, 2025

Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team label May 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 12, 2025

How to review these changes 👓

Thank you for your contribution. To review these changes, choose one of the following options:

A Hubber will need to deploy your changes internally to review.

Table of review links

Note: Please update the URL for your staging server or codespace.

The table shows the files in the content directory that were changed in this pull request. This helps you review your changes on a staging server. Changes to the data directory are not included in this table.

Source Review Production What Changed
actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/evaluate-expressions-in-workflows-and-actions.md fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.17 3.16 3.15 3.14 3.13
fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.17 3.16 3.15 3.14 3.13

Key: fpt: Free, Pro, Team; ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud; ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server

🤖 This comment is automatically generated.

@Sharra-writes
Copy link
Contributor

@silky-x0 Thanks for opening a PR to address this issue! I'll get it triaged for review.

@Sharra-writes Sharra-writes added content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team actions This issue or pull request should be reviewed by the docs actions team github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code needs SME This proposal needs review from a subject matter expert and removed triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team actions This issue or pull request should be reviewed by the docs actions team labels May 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a pull request! We've triaged this issue for technical review by a subject matter expert 👀

@TRIXMI

This comment was marked as spam.

@TRIXMI

This comment was marked as spam.

@TRIXMI

This comment was marked as spam.

@silky-x0
Copy link
Author

@TRIXMI could you please provide more info what you trying to say?

@Sharra-writes
Copy link
Contributor

@silky-x0 It's spam, probably a bot. We get a lot of them in here. Don't worry about it, I blocked it. If we start seeing more, I'll lock the conversation. Sometimes for whatever reason they all just pile into one specific issue or PR.

@silky-x0
Copy link
Author

@Sharra-writes okey, does it usually take this long to close PR related to DOCS?

@Sharra-writes
Copy link
Contributor

@silky-x0 We're a small team and for something that needs both an SME and writer review (as this does and will), I'm afraid I'm going to be thanking you for your patience a lot. 😅 I will keep you updated as we make our way through the review process, though.

And just to get it started, I do appreciate your patience. 💛

@silky-x0
Copy link
Author

@Sharra-writes no worries, patience is key.

Osama2035

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code needs SME This proposal needs review from a subject matter expert
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants