Skip to content

docs(breadcrumbs): 🏷️ add jsdoc for breadcrumbs #11504

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

cadesalaberry
Copy link
Contributor

@cadesalaberry cadesalaberry commented Apr 9, 2024

When interacting with the Breadcrumd API, I had some trouble finding the correct documentation. I retrieved my changes for the previous PR to make sure the JSDoc is updated with the actual doc.

Before submitting a pull request, please take a look at our
Contributing guidelines and verify:

  • If you've added code that should be tested, please add tests.
  • Ensure your code lints and the test suite passes (yarn lint) & (yarn test).

@cadesalaberry cadesalaberry force-pushed the docs/add-jsdoc-for-breadcrumbs branch from 4f0c653 to 67e4e02 Compare April 9, 2024 10:14
Copy link
Member

@Lms24 Lms24 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @cadesalaberry thanks for opening the PR!

This is pretty sophisticated JSDoc which we usually don't do in this capacity but it's completely fine to merge IMO. Thanks!

@Lms24 Lms24 merged commit f46b29e into getsentry:develop Apr 9, 2024
@cadesalaberry cadesalaberry deleted the docs/add-jsdoc-for-breadcrumbs branch April 10, 2024 14:30
cadesalaberry added a commit to cadesalaberry/sentry-javascript that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
When interacting with the Breadcrumd API, I had some trouble finding the
correct documentation. I retrieved my changes for the previous
[PR](getsentry#11119) to make
sure the JSDoc is updated with the actual doc.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants