Skip to content

Should we continue maintaining the manual Makefiles? #526

Closed
@milancurcic

Description

@milancurcic

With stdlib now being also an fpm package, as well as CMake support, should we continue maintaining the manual Makefiles?

I argued for manual Makefiles early on (before fpm) due to the possible absence of CMake or a sufficient version of CMake on many systems. However, the cost of maintaining manual Makefiles is quite high relative to the fpm or CMake build. For example, adding a new module and tests requires editing multiple Makefiles in the source tree. And it gets messier when trying to merge some older PRs, as the manual Makefiles would often be in conflict with the target branch.

We could run a poll on Discourse and see what users there think. I think this may be a good time to remove manual Makefile support. What do you think?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    build: makeIssue with stdlib's manual makefile buildquestionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions