Skip to content

Use WIFI_STA in WiFiClient-examples #2649

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2016
Merged

Use WIFI_STA in WiFiClient-examples #2649

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2016

Conversation

WereCatf
Copy link
Contributor

Many people have problems with using ESP8266 as WiFi-client due to
none of the examples mentioning that you should use WIFI_STA if you
only want the ESP8266 to act as a WiFi-client. Many WiFi-devices
will randomly try to connect to the ESP8266 if used as STA+AP and
complain about not being able to access the Internet or other devices
on the network.

Many people have problems with using ESP8266 as WiFi-client due to
none of the examples mentioning that you should use WIFI_STA if you
only want the ESP8266 to act as a WiFi-client. Many WiFi-devices
will randomly try to connect to the ESP8266 if used as STA+AP and
complain about not being able to access the Internet or other devices
on the network.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 29, 2016

Current coverage is 27.80% (diff: 100%)

Merging #2649 into master will not change coverage

@@             master      #2649   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            20         20          
  Lines          3625       3625          
  Methods         335        335          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches        656        656          
==========================================
  Hits           1008       1008          
  Misses         2441       2441          
  Partials        176        176          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 4897e00...d46d742

@igrr igrr merged commit 7ccafad into esp8266:master Nov 14, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants