Skip to content

8.18 client documentation updates #2925

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2025

Conversation

miguelgrinberg
Copy link
Contributor

These are client documentation updates that were included in the migration to md, but for some reason were lost in the asciidoc sources

Copy link

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

@miguelgrinberg miguelgrinberg requested a review from pquentin April 15, 2025 17:19
@miguelgrinberg miguelgrinberg marked this pull request as ready for review April 15, 2025 17:19
Copy link
Member

@pquentin pquentin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! LGTM.

Should this be opened against 8.x and then backported to 8.18?

@miguelgrinberg miguelgrinberg merged commit 6074eca into elastic:8.18 Apr 16, 2025
14 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
miguelgrinberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
(cherry picked from commit 6074eca)

Co-authored-by: Miguel Grinberg <miguel.grinberg@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants