Skip to content

Add support for _shard_doc sort with pit #5374

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 3, 2021
Merged

Conversation

stevejgordon
Copy link
Contributor

Contributes to #5337

@stevejgordon stevejgordon requested a review from Mpdreamz March 1, 2021 14:49
@stevejgordon stevejgordon mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2021
34 tasks
Copy link
Member

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stevejgordon stevejgordon force-pushed the feature/shard_doc_sort branch from 81ffb90 to ad4f099 Compare March 2, 2021 16:21
@stevejgordon stevejgordon merged commit f8e1637 into 7.12 Mar 3, 2021
@stevejgordon stevejgordon deleted the feature/shard_doc_sort branch March 3, 2021 11:29
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2021
* Add support for _shard_doc sort with pit

* Update test
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2021
* Add support for _shard_doc sort with pit

* Update test
stevejgordon added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2021
* Add support for _shard_doc sort with pit

* Update test

Co-authored-by: Steve Gordon <sgordon@hotmail.co.uk>
stevejgordon added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2021
* Add support for _shard_doc sort with pit (#5374)

* Add support for _shard_doc sort with pit

* Update test

* Fixup namespaces

Co-authored-by: Steve Gordon <sgordon@hotmail.co.uk>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants