LICENSE (the MIT License) and AUTHORS

[sprin]

See discussion on pgsql-pkg-docker:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1409760231.1316168.163210561.35383373@webmail.messagingengine.com

[yosifkit]

LGTM

/cc @tianon @jberkus

[yosifkit]

According to the mailing list, @jberkus is a go on the postgresql license. I'll count that as a LGTM from him, unless @jberkus otherwise objects here.

so @tianon ok to merge?

[tianon]

Is that copyright even meaningful? I don't think "Docker PostgreSQL Maintainers" is a legal entity of any kind, is it?

Also, I don't have a problem with the license, but it seems kind of silly that it's essentially just a custom version of Expat/MIT/X11.

[tianon]

(in other words, LGTM)

[jberkus]

tianon: yeah, we could also use MIT or BSD for this. The only reason The PostgreSQL License has different text is that it's a legacy license which can't be changed for the PostgreSQL Project, because it's inherited from UC Berkeley.

[sprin]

Switched to MIT, and added tianon and yosifkit as maintainers (valid legal entities, I hope!).

[jberkus]

Please add "other contributors not specifically named here" at the bottom. That way we don't have to update the license every time we accept a new PR.

[tianon]

Or maybe reference a separate AUTHORS file for the copyright since maintainers implies more than just copyright. ;)

(But I'm still +1 on "other contributors", perhaps even with a link to GitHub's contributors list)

[sprin]

Changed MAINTAINERS to AUTHORS and added to AUTHORS "And other contributors not specifically named here."

[tianon]

LGTM