Added conventional commits with JIRA scope.

[Crystalix007]

This adds a new commit standard which basically enforces the scope of the conventional commit to be in the form project-issueNumber, in order to comply with JIRA issue tagging.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #158 into master will decrease coverage by 4.18%.
The diff coverage is 40.29%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #158      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.54%   87.36%   -4.19%     
==========================================
  Files          33       35       +2     
  Lines         769      831      +62     
==========================================
+ Hits          704      726      +22     
- Misses         65      105      +40     

Flag	Coverage Δ
#unittests	87.36% <40.29%> (-4.19%)	⬇️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...mmitizen/cz/conventional_jira/conventional_jira.py	31.03% <31.03%> (ø)
commitizen/__version__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
commitizen/cz/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
commitizen/cz/conventional_jira/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
commitizen/cz/exceptions.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
commitizen/defaults.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7d4e3b9...95ebd27. Read the comment docs.

[woile]

I don't know if this needs to be part of the library, looks more like a plugin, they can easily be created with commitizen_cz_template.
We can create here a new page with a list of alternative commit rules.

What do you think @Lee-W ?

[Lee-W]

@woile I agree with you. It seems to me we should include only the most used templates in commitizen itself to make it lightweight. Maybe we can create a awesome-commitizen-template list for it?

[woile]

I'd link directly in the commitizen docs, like "Third party commitizen" or "Packages", or Catalog.

[Lee-W]

"Third party commitizen" seems to be a better one for me.

[Lee-W]

@Crystalix007 Thanks for your contribution! As discussed with @woile, we're not planning on making it a part of commitizen. Thus, I'm closing this PR. But we're happy to add this template as a third-party commitizen in our documentation. Please let us know if you want us to add it.

[Crystalix007]

Sorry for the delay.

Is this okay?

The source is hosted here.

[woile]

Yes, that's fine, you can create a PR for the docs, create a new section: Third party commitizen.