midje.tabular form indentation

[timvisher]

I can't make clojure-mode indent midje's tabular form correctly. I may be (read: almost certainly am) missing something, but it looks like it could be a bug in how clojure-mode is indenting maps.

I want things to look like:

(fact-group "charnock"
  (tabular
    (fact "depends on charnock with optional whitefield, piper, carson, wesley, calvin"
      (dependencies ?spec => ?expected)
    ?spec                                    ?expected
    {:spec-type          :theologians
     :charnock-column-id "charnock"}         #{"charnock"}
    {:spec-type          :theologians
     :charnock-column-id "current_charnock"} #{"current_charnock"}
    {:spec-type            :theologians
     :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
     :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"}     #{"charnock" "whitefield"}
    {:spec-type            :theologians
     :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
     :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"
     :piper-column-id      "piper"}          #{"charnock" "whitefield" "piper"}
    {:spec-type            :theologians
     :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
     :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"
     :piper-column-id      "piper"
     :carson-column-id     "carson"}         #{"charnock" "whitefield" "piper" "carson"}
    {:spec-type            :theologians
     :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
     :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"
     :piper-column-id      "piper"
     :carson-column-id     "carson"
     :wesley-column-id     "wesley"}         #{"charnock" "whitefield" "piper" "carson" "wesley"}
    {:spec-type            :theologians
     :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
     :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"
     :piper-column-id      "piper"
     :carson-column-id     "carson"
     :wesley-column-id     "wesley"
     :calvin-column-id     "calvin"}         #{"charnock" "whitefield" "piper" "carson" "wesley" "calvin"}))

While instead they look like this:

(fact-group "charnock"
  (tabular
   (fact "depends on charnock with optional whitefield, piper, carson, wesley, calvin"
     (dependencies ?spec => ?expected)
     ?spec                                    ?expected
     {:spec-type          :theologians
      :charnock-column-id "charnock"}         #{"charnock"}
      {:spec-type          :theologians
       :charnock-column-id "current_charnock"} #{"current_charnock"}
       {:spec-type            :theologians
        :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
        :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"}     #{"charnock" "whitefield"}
        {:spec-type            :theologians
         :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
         :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"
         :piper-column-id      "piper"}          #{"charnock" "whitefield" "piper"}
         {:spec-type            :theologians
          :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
          :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"
          :piper-column-id      "piper"
          :carson-column-id     "carson"}         #{"charnock" "whitefield" "piper" "carson"}
          {:spec-type            :theologians
           :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
           :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"
           :piper-column-id      "piper"
           :carson-column-id     "carson"
           :wesley-column-id     "wesley"}         #{"charnock" "whitefield" "piper" "carson" "wesley"}
           {:spec-type            :theologians
            :charnock-column-id   "charnock"
            :whitefield-column-id "whitefield"
            :piper-column-id      "piper"
            :carson-column-id     "carson"
            :wesley-column-id     "wesley"
            :calvin-column-id     "calvin"}         #{"charnock" "whitefield" "piper" "carson" "wesley" "calvin"}))

Notice how it almost looks like each consecutive top-level pair is being interpreted as if it should be inside the previous map? That's what leads me to think it's a bug.

The relevant config I've done might be:

(put-clojure-indent 'fact-group 1)
(put-clojure-indent 'fact 1)
(put-clojure-indent 'tabular nil)

Where I had tried other values for 'tabular (1 and 2).

I'm happy to try to provide anything I can that would help get this fixed.

Thanks as always for your hard work!

[Malabarba]

Much like #296, this is an Emacs bug. (sadly)