forked from openapi-generators/openapi-python-client
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Feat/detect discriminator bnch 49688 #143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1b82ec1
add discriminator
straz b7dfe04
merge from main
straz f700e1b
initialize discriminator mappings
straz 632f0af
getter for discriminator python_name
straz d8cbf02
remove unused method
straz 71a01b8
fix discriminator.mapping null case
straz 6215432
merge from main
straz d847f38
more inline discriminator properties
straz 3c1b5b1
add discriminator_property.pyi
straz fce2d59
move discriminator property over to aurelia
straz c8c30cd
handle unknowntype for discriminator properties
straz d11fa4c
walk oneOf as well as anyOf references
straz 230da4c
add parsing of toplevel UnionProperty
straz 9afe1d2
support toplevel unionProperty
straz 36f4b87
add nested parameter to construct macro
straz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we do this since the above line checks data.discriminator is not None?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, good catch, thanks!
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, hmm. I think I had that there because
data.discriminator
might be{"mapping": None}
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If
{"mapping": None}
then this will still returnNone
since the check is ondata.discriminator
right?May be worth a closer look.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have something like this in mind:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your intent makes sense.
To make your code match your intent I think you need to change the code from:
to:
or:
alternatively you could replace both checks with EAFP
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right indeed, thanks! hopefully fixed this.