Skip to content

Feature request: widen types for Logger arguments #1777

Closed as not planned
Closed as not planned
@dreamorosi

Description

@dreamorosi

Use case

The current implementation of our Logger is fairly stringent when it comes to types and objects allowed in the logs when compared with the Python implementation.

For instance, in Python it’s possible to log a wide number of objects:

from dataclasses import dataclass
from aws_lambda_powertools import Logger

logger = Logger()


@dataclass
class Stuff:
    def __init__(self, name):
        self.name = name


def main():
    logger.info("Hello world!")
    logger.info(3)
    logger.info(True)
    logger.info(Stuff("foo"))
    try:
        raise Exception("Something went wrong")
    except Exception as e:
        logger.info(e)
    logger.info({"foo": "bar"})
    logger.info(None)
    logger.info([1, 2, 3])


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

which produce the following logs:

{"level":"INFO","location":"main:14","message":"Hello world!","timestamp":"2023-10-31 10:42:27,011+0100","service":"service_undefined"}
{"level":"INFO","location":"main:15","message":3,"timestamp":"2023-10-31 10:42:27,011+0100","service":"service_undefined"}
{"level":"INFO","location":"main:16","message":true,"timestamp":"2023-10-31 10:42:27,011+0100","service":"service_undefined"}
{"level":"INFO","location":"main:17","message":"Stuff()","timestamp":"2023-10-31 10:42:27,011+0100","service":"service_undefined"}
{"level":"INFO","location":"main:21","message":"Something went wrong","timestamp":"2023-10-31 10:42:27,011+0100","service":"service_undefined"}
{"level":"INFO","location":"main:22","message":{"foo":"bar"},"timestamp":"2023-10-31 10:42:27,011+0100","service":"service_undefined"}
{"level":"INFO","location":"main:23","timestamp":"2023-10-31 10:42:27,011+0100","service":"service_undefined"}
{"level":"INFO","location":"main:24","message":[1,2,3],"timestamp":"2023-10-31 10:42:27,011+0100","service":"service_undefined"}

On TypeScript instead, the current typing allows the first argument to only be a string, and the second a limited amount of types (mainly strings, objects, and errors).

A condensed version of the current types, and its limitation can be found in this TS Playground.

We should aim at expanding the type of arguments of the logger to more closely align with the Python counterpart.

Solution/User Experience

You can find the proposed types in this other TS playground, but essentially after the changes, it should be possible to log all the following:

logger.info('hi');
logger.info('hi', { bob: '' });
logger.info('hi', { bob: 1 });
logger.info('hi', { bob: true });
logger.info('hi', { bob: undefined });
logger.info('hi', { bob: BigInt(1212) });
logger.info('hi', { error: new Error('ol'), bob: 1 });
logger.info('hi', { stuff: new Error('ol') });
logger.info('error', new Error('bummer'));
logger.info(3);
logger.info(undefined);
logger.info(true);
logger.info(null);
logger.info([1, 2, 3]);
logger.info([1, 2, 3, 'a']);
logger.info({ foo: 'bar', message: 'string' });
logger.info({ foo: 'bar', message: 2 });
logger.info({ foo: 'bar' });
logger.info(new Error('hi'));
// @ts-expect-error - second argument must be an object, otherwise we don't know where to put it on the top level
logger.info('hello', 2);
// @ts-expect-error - we limit types to non serializable ones (maybe a bad idea)
logger.info('hi', { bob: new Map([[1, 2]]) });
// @ts-expect-error - you cannot override the `message` key when already specifying the first argument  
logger.info('hi', { message: 'bar' });

Alternative solutions

No response

Acknowledgment

Future readers

Please react with 👍 and your use case to help us understand customer demand.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    feature-requestThis item refers to a feature request for an existing or new utilityloggerThis item relates to the Logger UtilityrejectedThis is something we will not be working on. At least, not in the measurable future

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Status

    Closed

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions