Maintenance: improve names of adaptive types in SSMProvider

[dreamorosi]

Summary

In the last release (1.8.0-beta) we have introduced new adaptive types for the SSMProvider part of the Parameters utility.

Some of the generics type variable names are unnecessarily cryptic (i.e. T or O) and we can improve on that.

Why is this needed?

So that future readers and prospective contributors, as well as our future selves, can better understand what's going on with these types.

Which area does this relate to?

Parameters

Solution

Rename the type names to something clearer.

Acknowledgment

• This request meets Lambda Powertools Tenets
• Should this be considered in other Lambda Powertools languages? i.e. Python, Java, and .NET

Future readers

Please react with 👍 and your use case to help us understand customer demand.

[dreamorosi]

PR opened #1413

[github-actions]

⚠️ COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING ⚠️

Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see.
If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.
If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.

[github-actions]

This is now released under v1.9.0 version!