-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 616
Support multiple PARTITION
statements in ALTER TABLE ADD
statement
#1011
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support multiple PARTITION
statements in ALTER TABLE ADD
statement
#1011
Conversation
Thanks @bitemyapp -- This is on my list -- can you please resolve the CI failures and I'll take a look |
…i-partition-declarations
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the contribution @bitemyapp -- I took the liberty of merge this branch up from main, fixing the compile error, and simplifying the logic.
tests/sqlparser_hive.rs
Outdated
|
||
#[test] | ||
fn parse_describe() { | ||
let describe = r#"DESCRIBE namespace.`table`"#; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this I think was part of #1010, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes sorry, this MR was based on top of 1010's because I was scrupulous/worried about accidentally having them trip over each other. I think that was a mistake and I should've kept the branches and patches independent of each other. Looks like it worked out anyway, thank you!
PARTITION
statements in ALTER TABLE ADD
statement
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 6626049286
💛 - Coveralls |
apache#1011) Co-authored-by: Chris A <chrisa@indeed.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Lamb <andrew@nerdnetworks.org>
Revival of #657
Closes #657
Similar story to #1010
I compared the patches and nothing seemed to have changed significantly with the rebase. Please let me know what I'd need to do to make this merge-able. This patch includes #1010 so you could merge this one and close the other or merge the other first and then I can rebase this patch again.