Skip to content

Avoid unneeded slice+splice in _pageData #16555

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2019
Merged

Avoid unneeded slice+splice in _pageData #16555

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2019

Conversation

paulferaud
Copy link
Contributor

.slice().splice(index, pageSize) will create an unneeded full copy of the underlying data, and then also mutate it to splice a page. Neither of these operations are needed, and can be particularly slow for larger datasets.
.slice(index, index + indexPageSize) is almost constant time.

In case of a datasource with 1,000,000 rows (big, yes, but not absurdly so), pagination is currently visibly sluggish on my machine. Benchmarks seem to blame this: https://measurethat.net/Benchmarks/ShowResult/62222

.slice().splice(index, pageSize) will create an unneeded full copy of the underlying data, and then also mutate it to splice a page. Neither of these operations are needed, and can be particularly slow for larger datasets.
.slice(index, index + indexPageSize) is almost constant time.

In case of a datasource with 1,000,000 rows (big, yes, but not absurdly so), pagination is currently visibly sluggish on my machine. Benchmarks seem to blame this: https://measurethat.net/Benchmarks/ShowResult/62222
@paulferaud paulferaud requested a review from andrewseguin as a code owner July 17, 2019 19:52
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Jul 17, 2019
Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Thanks for the cleanup!

@jelbourn jelbourn added G This is is related to a Google internal issue pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Jul 18, 2019
@ngbot

This comment has been minimized.

@jelbourn jelbourn added target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release and removed pr: merge safe labels Jul 18, 2019
@jelbourn jelbourn merged commit e4f710a into angular:master Jul 19, 2019
andrewseguin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2019
.slice().splice(index, pageSize) will create an unneeded full copy of the underlying data, and then also mutate it to splice a page. Neither of these operations are needed, and can be particularly slow for larger datasets.
.slice(index, index + indexPageSize) is almost constant time.

In case of a datasource with 1,000,000 rows (big, yes, but not absurdly so), pagination is currently visibly sluggish on my machine. Benchmarks seem to blame this: https://measurethat.net/Benchmarks/ShowResult/62222
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 11, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement G This is is related to a Google internal issue target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants