Skip to content

fix(ivy): ViewRef.rootNodes not including projected nodes #28951

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

crisbeto
Copy link
Member

Currently if an embedded view contains projected nodes, its rootNodes array will include null instead of the root nodes inside the projection slot. This manifested itself in one of the Material unit tests where we stamp out a template and then move its rootNodes into the overlay container.

This PR is related to FW-1087.

Currently if an embedded view contains projected nodes, its `rootNodes` array will include `null` instead of the root nodes inside the projection slot. This manifested itself in one of the Material unit tests where we stamp out a template and then move its `rootNodes` into the overlay container.

This PR is related to FW-1087.
@crisbeto crisbeto added type: bug/fix action: review The PR is still awaiting reviews from at least one requested reviewer comp: ivy labels Feb 24, 2019
@crisbeto crisbeto marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2019 16:09
@crisbeto crisbeto requested review from a team as code owners February 24, 2019 16:09
@ngbot ngbot bot added this to the needsTriage milestone Feb 24, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@kara kara left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

crisbeto added a commit to crisbeto/angular that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2019
Updates the root causes for the remaining `MatMenu` tests. Note that two tests are omitted from this PR, because one will be fixed by angular#28951 and the other one depends on static queries and will be refactored by angular/components#15289.
@kara
Copy link
Contributor

kara commented Feb 24, 2019

presubmit

@kara kara added action: presubmit The PR is in need of a google3 presubmit and removed action: review The PR is still awaiting reviews from at least one requested reviewer labels Feb 24, 2019
benlesh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2019
Updates the root causes for the remaining `MatMenu` tests. Note that two tests are omitted from this PR, because one will be fixed by #28951 and the other one depends on static queries and will be refactored by angular/components#15289.

PR Close #28952
@kara kara added action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker merge: caretaker note Alert the caretaker performing the merge to check the PR for an out of normal action needed or note and removed action: presubmit The PR is in need of a google3 presubmit labels Feb 26, 2019
@kara
Copy link
Contributor

kara commented Feb 26, 2019

merge-assistance: core approval should be sufficient

@benlesh benlesh added target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release and removed target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Feb 26, 2019
@benlesh benlesh closed this in 25a2fef Feb 26, 2019
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 14, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes merge: caretaker note Alert the caretaker performing the merge to check the PR for an out of normal action needed or note target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release type: bug/fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants