Webpack support

[itrethan]

One issue with angularjs is the initial load time, webpack helps module the application and loads scrips on demand.

Angular 2 will have build in support for module. However, it seems that the angular community is pretty upset about the up coming version. So webpack is still preferred is this project plans to stick to angularjs

[leonardoanalista]

Webpack support would be nice. You would have to run front and back end code in separate processes. Webpack in one terminal, grunt to start up node in another, which is fine in my opinion.
I am using webpack in a large project and the re-compile in-memory is extremely fast.

[thinq4yourself]

Default Webpack/Browserfy support would be amazing 👍

[brownish]

+1

[Awk34]

I'm hoping to get initial support for Webpack in an upcoming beta release

[gazzwi86]

+1

This would be awesome. I was just reading up on Webpack 2 and feel that may be favoured - https://medium.com/modus-create-front-end-development/webpack-2-tree-shaking-configuration-9f1de90f3233#.yqcdl65p1

[itrethan]

Since angular2 will have lazy loading with native support. I am not sure if
it's still meaningful to have it.
On Feb 15, 2016 7:57 PM, "Gareth Williams" notifications@github.com wrote:

+1

This would be awesome. I was just reading up on Webpack 2 and feel that
may be favoured -
https://medium.com/modus-create-front-end-development/webpack-2-tree-shaking-configuration-9f1de90f3233#.yqcdl65p1

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1196 (comment)
.