Skip to content

Allowing for a single container override #116

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 27, 2019
Merged

Allowing for a single container override #116

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 27, 2019

Conversation

ZeeCoder
Copy link
Owner

fixes #67

@ZeeCoder ZeeCoder merged commit 8ce904e into master Jan 27, 2019
@ZeeCoder ZeeCoder deleted the allow-for-one-container-override branch January 27, 2019 17:15
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 98.416% when pulling ed9ba73 on allow-for-one-container-override into 092daa3 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.01%) to 98.416% when pulling ed9ba73 on allow-for-one-container-override into 092daa3 on master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow one @define-container; declaration in singleContainer mode
2 participants
@ZeeCoder @coveralls