Skip to content

Update dependency babel-eslint to v7.2.3 #12

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate-bot renovate-bot commented Oct 27, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
babel-eslint 7.1.1 -> 7.2.3 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

babel/babel-eslint (babel-eslint)

v7.2.3

Compare Source

Fix

v7.2.2

Compare Source

v7.2.2

  • Fix: use eslint-scope instead of escope if present (#​461) (Vitor Balocco)
  • Separate finding peer deps from monkeypatching (#​460) (Andres Suarez)
  • Remove unused .gitmodules (#​457) (Andres Suarez)
  • Use dedent for unpadding (#​456) (Andres Suarez)
  • Enable strict mode in all of babylon-to-espree (Andres Suarez)
  • Move ast convert steps to babylon-to-espree (Andres Suarez)
  • Use for-loop for template literal conversion (Andres Suarez)
  • Only iterate over tokens once (Andres Suarez)
  • Inline fixDirectives and use for-loop (Andres Suarez)
  • Consolidate versions of "convertComments" (Andres Suarez)
  • toAst pass "source" in state instead of keeping in scope (Andres Suarez)
  • Add type parameter scope tests (#​454) (Andres Suarez)

v7.2.1

Compare Source

v7.2.0

Compare Source

New Feature
  • Add option to disable code frame. (#​446) (Luís Couto)

Main change is just an option to disable the codeframe (added in v7.1.1) for html output and more (thanks to @​Couto).

{
  "parser": "babel-eslint",
  "parserOptions": {
    "codeFrame": false
  },
  "extends": "eslint:recommended"
}
Bug Fix
  • [flow] Process polymorphic type bounds on functions (#​444) (Alex Rattray)
Internal/Docs
  • Use lodash instead of lodash.pickby. (#​435) (wtgtybhertgeghgtwtg)
  • Updates ESLint version/remove unnecessary config (Kai Cataldo)
  • Remove broken ESLint tests (Kai Cataldo)
  • Upgrade outdated dependencies (Kai Cataldo)
  • remove deprecated rule examples [skip ci] (Henry Zhu)
  • update readme [skip ci] (Henry Zhu)
  • chore(package): update eslint-config-babel to version 6.0.0 (#​433) (Henry Zhu)
  • Update to use Node 4 features (#​425) (Nazim Hajidin)
  • chore(package): update eslint-config-babel to version 4.0.0 (#​430) (greenkeeper[bot])
  • add badges [skip ci] (Henry Zhu)
  • Revert "use *" (#​426) (Henry Zhu)
  • use * (#​421) (Henry Zhu)
  • chore(package): update eslint-config-babel to version 3.0.0 (#​423) (greenkeeper[bot])

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@bolt-new-by-stackblitz
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 27, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 327cfc3

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@renovate-bot renovate-bot force-pushed the renovate/babel-eslint-7.x-lockfile branch from 0d0d511 to 327cfc3 Compare January 23, 2025 18:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant