Skip to content

Fix exceptional graph building #656 #1165

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2022

Conversation

sergeypospelov
Copy link
Member

Description

Fixes #656

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

Automated Testing

A new test was added.

Manual Scenario

To reproduce section from #656 passes.

Checklist (remove irrelevant options):

This is the author self-check list

  • The change followed the style guidelines of the UTBot project
  • Self-review of the code is passed
  • The change contains enough commentaries, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • No new warnings
  • New tests have been added
  • All tests pass locally with my changes

@sergeypospelov sergeypospelov force-pushed the sergey/fix_exceptional_graph_building branch from 163a295 to 19056f9 Compare October 16, 2022 10:14
@sergeypospelov sergeypospelov force-pushed the sergey/fix_exceptional_graph_building branch from 19056f9 to 6111b06 Compare October 16, 2022 10:27
Copy link
Contributor

@korifey korifey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very strange buggy code in Soot. Please make PR for soot, because it's since 2004.

@sergeypospelov sergeypospelov merged commit e77dcf0 into main Oct 16, 2022
@sergeypospelov sergeypospelov deleted the sergey/fix_exceptional_graph_building branch October 16, 2022 11:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Not found local variable during method analysis
2 participants