Skip to content

[draft] Fix arginfo for tidy's global functions and methods #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

TysonAndre
Copy link
Owner

This prevents subclasses from being written with incompatible
implementations, e.g. expecting more required args.

dstogov and others added 9 commits February 18, 2019 17:52
* PHP-7.4:
  Use "quick" macro variants for known argument numbers
* PHP-7.4:
  Fixed bug #77632 (FFI Segfaults When Called With Variadics)
See https://secure.php.net/tidy_getopt , etc.

I can't find any other obvious incorrect reflection.
This prevents subclasses from being written with incompatible
implementations, e.g. expecting more required args.
@TysonAndre TysonAndre force-pushed the tidy-arginfo-expect-0-args branch from ffde287 to 920302e Compare February 18, 2019 16:58
@TysonAndre TysonAndre closed this Oct 7, 2019
@TysonAndre TysonAndre deleted the tidy-arginfo-expect-0-args branch October 7, 2019 13:29
TysonAndre pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2021
1. For statement "$a->change($a = array("a" => range(1, 5)));", the
following opcodes will be generated:

  0002 ASSIGN CV0($a) V1
  0003 INIT_METHOD_CALL 1 CV0($a) string("change")
  0004 INIT_NS_FCALL_BY_NAME 2 string("A\range")
  0005 SEND_VAL_EX int(1) 1
  0006 SEND_VAL_EX int(5) 2
  0007 V1 = DO_FCALL_BY_NAME

The updates in function zend_jit_init_fcall(), zend_jit_send_val() and
zend_jit_do_fcall() are made to support INIT_NS_FCALL_BY_NAME,
SEND_VAL_EX and DO_FCALL_BY_NAME respectively.

2. For method $change(), opcode RECV is used to obtain the argument:

  0000 #1.CV0($config) [rc1, rcn, array of [any, ref]] = RECV 1

Accordingly the updates in functions zend_jit_recv() and
zend_jit_verify_arg_type() are made.

3. For statement "array_keys($config["a"])", the following opcodes will
be generated:

  0001 INIT_NS_FCALL_BY_NAME 1 string("A\array_keys")
  0002 CHECK_FUNC_ARG 1
  0003 #3.V1 [ref, rc1, rcn, any] = FETCH_DIM_FUNC_ARG #1.CV0($config)
     ... -> #2.CV0($config) [rc1, rcn, ...
  0004 SEND_FUNC_ARG #3.V1 [ref, rc1, rcn, any] 1
  0005 #4.V1 [ref, rc1, rcn, any] = DO_FCALL_BY_NAME

CHECK_FUNC_ARG and SEND_FUNC_ARG are not supported before. See the
updates in functions zend_jit_check_func_arg() and zend_jit_send_var().

Besides, a new path is covered in macro OBJ_RELEASE when leaving.
TysonAndre pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2021
The following opcodes would be generated for $foo:

  0000 #2.CV0($test) [bool] RANGE[0..1] = RECV 1
  0001 #3.CV1($x) [long] RANGE[MIN..MAX] = RECV 2
  0002 JMPZ #2.CV0($test) [bool] RANGE[0..1] BB4
  0003 #4.T2 [bool] ... = IS_SMALLER_OR_EQUAL int(1) #3.CV1($x) ...
  0004 JMP BB5
  ...

The updates in function zend_jit_verify_arg_type() are made to support
RECV opcode.

The updates in function zend_jit_bool_jmpznz() are made to support JMPZ
opcode.

New path is covered in functions zend_jit_cmp() and
zend_jit_cmp_long_long() for IS_SMALLER_OR_EQUAL opcode.
TysonAndre pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2021
Opcodes for $test are:

  BB0:
  0000 #1.CV0($char_code) [rc1, rcn, any] = RECV 1

  BB1:
  0001 #2.T1 [rc1, ...] = BW_AND #1.CV0($char_code) ...
  0002 #3.T2 [bool] RANGE[0..1] = BOOL_NOT #2.T1 [rc1, ...]
  0003 #4.T1 [bool] RANGE[0..1] = IS_EQUAL #1.CV0($char_code) ...
  0004 JMPZ #4.T1 [bool] RANGE[0..1] BB3
  ...

New path is covered in function zend_jit_long_math_helper() for opcode
BW_AND.

New path is covered in function zend_jit_bool_jmpznz() for opcode
BOOL_NOT.

Major changes lie in functions zend_jit_cmp(), zend_jit_cmp_slow() and
zend_jit_check_exception_undef_result() to support opocdes IS_EQUAL and
JMPZ.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants