-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
[cobweb] Update editorial suggestions #435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for taupe-gaufre-c4e660 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
lectures/cobweb.md
Outdated
- If $ g $ hits the 45 degree line at $p_t$, then we have $ p_{t+1} = p_t $, so $ p_t $ is a steady state. | ||
- If $ g $ lies above the 45-degree line at $p_t$, then we have $ p_{t+1} > p_t $. | ||
- If $ g $ lies below the 45-degree line at $p_t$, then we have $ p_{t+1} < p_t $. | ||
- If $ g $ hits the 45-degree line at $p_t$, then we have $ p_{t+1} = p_t $, so $ p_t $ is a {ref}` steady state <scalar-dynam:steady-state>`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this steady state
link required here or is the steady state
terminology clearly understood in this context?
lectures/cobweb.md
Outdated
@@ -326,21 +326,21 @@ m = Market() | |||
plot45(m, 0, 9, 2, num_arrows=3) | |||
``` | |||
|
|||
The plot shows the function $g$ defined in {eq}`def_g` and the $45$ degree line. | |||
The plot shows the function $g$ defined in {eq}`def_g` and the $45\degree$ line. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@SylviaZhaooo this syntax is causing the pdf
builder to fail
! Emergency stop.
l.24065 ...ation:cobweb:def_g} and the \(45\degree
\) line.
Thanks for pointing out the issue. |
thanks @SylviaZhaooo @jstac this is ready for your review. |
thanks for the updates @HumphreyYang @jstac this is now ready for final review. |
Co-authored-by: Matt McKay <mmcky@users.noreply.github.com>
Many thanks @SylviaZhaooo ! Merging. |
Resolve comments in #433