fix: assessments buttons

[orronai]

• Unfocus after clicking an assessment
• Assessment is now changed after select and not after fully checked solution

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #339 (e10165d) into master (cf9039f) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #339      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.94%   83.96%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          63       63              
  Lines        2940     2950      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         2468     2477       +9     
- Misses        472      473       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lms/lmsdb/models.py	91.08% <100.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
lms/lmsweb/views.py	93.11% <100.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️
lms/models/solutions.py	98.97% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cf9039f...e10165d. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.10%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	1.72 ⭐	1.68 ⭐	-0.04 👍
Method Length	48.14 ⭐	47.84 ⭐	-0.30 👍
Working memory	7.48 🙂	7.46 🙂	-0.02 👍
Quality	75.90% ⭐	76.00% ⭐	0.10% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	2518	2529	11

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
lms/lmsdb/models.py	84.30% ⭐	84.48% ⭐	0.18% 👍
lms/lmsweb/views.py	75.10% ⭐	75.31% ⭐	0.21% 👍
lms/models/solutions.py	74.06% 🙂	74.82% 🙂	0.76% 👍
tests/test_notifications.py	70.44% 🙂	70.46% 🙂	0.02% 👍
tests/test_solutions.py	69.11% 🙂	68.82% 🙂	-0.29% 👎

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
lms/lmsweb/views.py	comment	13 🙂	202 😞	8 🙂	50.15% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods
tests/test_solutions.py	TestSolutionBridge.test_staff_and_user_comments	0 ⭐	236 ⛔	12 😞	52.40% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/test_solutions.py	TestSolutionBridge.test_share_solution_function	0 ⭐	248 ⛔	11 😞	53.48% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
tests/test_notifications.py	TestNotification.test_user_commented_after_check	0 ⭐	215 ⛔	12 😞	53.71% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
lms/models/solutions.py	get_view_parameters	5 ⭐	139 😞	12 😞	55.53% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!

[yammesicka]

AAA Job, thanks!

[yammesicka]

Awesome job! I like both the decoupling and the cleanness of this function