-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 966
Correct month range in ok
member description
#4215
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@christopherdoyle : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change. |
Learn Build status updates of commit f31c7cb: ✅ Validation status: passed
For more details, please refer to the build report. Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report. For any questions, please:
|
Can you review the proposed changes? IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, add a #label:"aq-pr-triaged" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @christopherdoyle for taking the time to fix this up.
* Document ARM64 unwind handling for return address signing * Update date, fix step numbers * Fix style, grammar in Arm64 Exception * Rename pac_sign_lr and update reserved ranges. * example needed to mitigate dev floundering (#4210) It is not easy to match up variant vt types with POD types. Especially since there is a gradual transition to modern C++. I used a number of dev hours on attempts to match the variant type, vt, to make the true/false work. The m_bValue type for the simple property was a BOOL type, but trying to create a variant of type BOOL directly didn't work. Only by looking at VC Sample code for VisualStudioDemo did I see the (_variant_t)true construct, which becomes the standard_cast contruct in modern C++. I figured my Example code could make other programmer's efforts easier. * Confirm merge from FromPublicMasterBranch to main to sync with https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs (branch main) (#4571) * 10/11/2022 AM Publish (#4570) * Document ARM64 unwind handling for return address signing * Update date, fix step numbers * Fix style, grammar in Arm64 Exception Co-authored-by: opbld17 <opbld17@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Colin Robertson <3836425+corob-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: opbld16 <opbld16@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: opbld15 <opbld15@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> Co-authored-by: prmerger-automator[bot] <40007230+prmerger-automator[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * example needed to mitigate dev floundering (#4210) It is not easy to match up variant vt types with POD types. Especially since there is a gradual transition to modern C++. I used a number of dev hours on attempts to match the variant type, vt, to make the true/false work. The m_bValue type for the simple property was a BOOL type, but trying to create a variant of type BOOL directly didn't work. Only by looking at VC Sample code for VisualStudioDemo did I see the (_variant_t)true construct, which becomes the standard_cast contruct in modern C++. I figured my Example code could make other programmer's efforts easier. Co-authored-by: Taojunshen <v-jutao@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: opbld17 <opbld17@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Colin Robertson <3836425+corob-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: opbld16 <opbld16@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: opbld15 <opbld15@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> Co-authored-by: prmerger-automator[bot] <40007230+prmerger-automator[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rtischer8277 <rtischer@hiveware.com> * cleanup empty remarks and tidy up code example formatting * Confirm merge from FromPublicMasterBranch to main to sync with https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs (branch main) (#4573) * Use the correct canonical opcode name in the packed unwind table This was a leftover from the original tentative name before the real one was known. * Correct Month range in `ok` member description (#4215) Co-authored-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> Co-authored-by: Colin Robertson <3836425+corob-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Christopher Doyle <christophercormac@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: opbld17 <opbld17@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Colin Robertson <3836425+corob-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: opbld16 <opbld16@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: opbld15 <opbld15@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> Co-authored-by: prmerger-automator[bot] <40007230+prmerger-automator[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Pedro Miguel Justo <40605312+pmsjt@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: rtischer8277 <rtischer@hiveware.com> Co-authored-by: Feng Xu <fenxu@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: TylerMSFT <Tyler.Whitney@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: Christopher Doyle <christophercormac@outlook.com> Co-authored-by: Linda Spiller <93278958+LJSpiller@users.noreply.github.com>
…//github.com/MicrosoftDocs/cpp-docs (branch main) (#4573) * Use the correct canonical opcode name in the packed unwind table This was a leftover from the original tentative name before the real one was known. * Correct Month range in `ok` member description (#4215) Co-authored-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st> Co-authored-by: Colin Robertson <3836425+corob-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Christopher Doyle <christophercormac@outlook.com>
Trivial change, description likely copied from day class.