Skip to content

scanWith #208

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2023
Merged

scanWith #208

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 18, 2023

Conversation

hoc081098
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 18, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (3e4c258) 64.67% compared to head (365ba36) 64.61%.

Files Patch % Lines
...in/java/com/hoc/flowmvi/data/UserRepositoryImpl.kt 90.00% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #208      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   64.67%   64.61%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          53       53              
  Lines        1220     1218       -2     
  Branches      133      133              
==========================================
- Hits          789      787       -2     
  Misses        411      411              
  Partials       20       20              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hoc081098 hoc081098 merged commit e4eca83 into master Nov 18, 2023
@hoc081098 hoc081098 deleted the scanWith branch November 18, 2023 11:12
}
changesFlow
.onEach { Timber.d("[USER_REPO] Change=$it") }
.scanWith(::getUsersFromRemoteWithRetry) { acc, change ->

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👏

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙏💪

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants