reporting format of benchmarks

[amueller]

As discussed here: scikit-learn/scikit-learn#14247 (comment)

I think the current report is very hard to read.
It might be helpful to specify very clearly what the baseline is, that is the meaning of 1 in all the plots - it's your own C++ implementation.

For a comparison with scikit-learn I think doing sklearn speed / your c++ speed would be easier to read as it shows your speedup factor, not our slow-down factor.

Finally, I don't see the number of cores in your benchmark, which is pretty crucial since most of our implementations are single-threaded. Yes, that's a big issue, but saying "we're 100x faster" without saying "on 100 CPUs instead of 1" is quite misleading.
It might be helpful to have a chart of speedup vs number of CPUs.