Skip to content

Support for dtostrf() #309

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 53 commits into from
Closed

Support for dtostrf() #309

wants to merge 53 commits into from

Conversation

jgfoster
Copy link
Member

@jgfoster jgfoster commented Sep 2, 2021

This is a function provided by Arduino that isn't in the standard C library.

jgfoster and others added 30 commits February 15, 2021 10:47
…}` so that other code can define a `yield()` function.
@jgfoster
Copy link
Member Author

jgfoster commented Sep 2, 2021

Sorry, this should have been a branch from master. Let me know if you want it resubmitted.

@jgfoster
Copy link
Member Author

jgfoster commented Oct 4, 2021

This PR was a branch from main instead of master so has been replaced with #313 (was, incorrectly #309!).

@jgfoster jgfoster closed this Oct 4, 2021
@ianfixes
Copy link
Collaborator

ianfixes commented Oct 4, 2021

edit: 309 is a typo, #313 is the replacement

@jgfoster
Copy link
Member Author

jgfoster commented Oct 4, 2021

Yes, that's right. My main has all my changes merged into it and I should be making my PRs on a branch from master which tracks upstream master. I made the mistake of branching from my main so the initial PR had a huge number of modified files. In order to do a clean merge I recreated the proposed changes in a clean PR.

@jgfoster
Copy link
Member Author

jgfoster commented Oct 4, 2021

And, if you have any substantive comments on closed PRs (like this one), I'm happy to revert or supplement...

@ianfixes
Copy link
Collaborator

ianfixes commented Oct 4, 2021

Any changes that have unit tests attached are generally fine with me, we can always add to the suite if/when we find a problem with the implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants