Skip to content

Commit 0af3216

Browse files
committed
wording
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <a_meszaros@apple.com>
1 parent bcf3757 commit 0af3216

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

docs/content/en/blog/news/primary-cache-for-next-recon.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ We recently released v5.1 of Java Operator SDK. One of the highlights of this re
99
[allocated values](https://github.com/kubernetes/community/blob/master/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/api-conventions.md#representing-allocated-values
1010
) in Kubernetes.
1111

12-
To sum up the problem, for example, if we create a resource in our controller that has a generated ID -
12+
To sum up the problem, let's say if we create a resource from our controller that has a generated ID -
1313
in other words, we cannot address the resource only by using the values from the `.spec` -
14-
we have to store it, usually in the `.status` of the custom resource. However, operator frameworks cache resources
14+
we have to store this ID, usually in the `.status` of the custom resource. However, operator frameworks cache resources
1515
using informers, so the update that you made to the status of the custom resource will just eventually get into
1616
the cache of the informer. If meanwhile some other event triggers the reconciliation, it can happen that we will
1717
see the stale custom resource in the cache (in another word, the cache is eventually consistent) without the generated ID in the status.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)