why no override inputs? #751
Unanswered
DockterTeagle
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
furthermore you could use _module.args.pkgs = import nixpkgs {
inherit system;
overlays = with inputs; [
fenix.overlays.default
];
}; in the flake.nix, otherwise I think you are getting rid of the benefits of flake-parts? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Ive made a fork and am implementing these changes, will open a pull request if it is done and you are willing to make this small change. it is 0:36 rn, so I am going to bed |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Checked other resources
:h rustaceanvim
.Description
this is a minor nag, but rustacean does not override any of its inputs, this leads to approximatley 900 more lines of code in the flake.lock. afaik none of these inputs use cachix, so the only reason to not do it is to avoid writing less.
Example Code
Neovim version (nvim -v)
v0.12.0-nightly+2c1f5a6
Operating system/version
Nixos unstable
Output of :checkhealth rustaceanvim
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions